blog.paulmurray.net
Paul Murray's weblog, with news you may have missed and my $0.02 worth on a number of topics.

"You can't make up anything anymore. The world itself is a satire. All you're doing is recording it."
- Art Buchwald

I bet you don't have a friend who's an acupuncturist

E-mail me: pmurray63 [at] hotmail.com (Be patient, I don't check it often.)

Powered by Blogger A community weblog covering all aspects of politics Get Firefox! Electronic Frontier Foundation Eliminate DRM!

Blogs of Note
Metafilter
Kottke.org
Rafe Coburn
JD Lasica
Paul Boutin
Linkfilter
Monkeyfilter
GlennLogs
Mark Evanier
Ken Levine
Rogers Cadenhead
Lifehacker

Political Blogs
Talking Points Memo
Wash Monthly
Political Wire
Devoter

Net Radio
Pandora
Mostly Classical

Banner

Tuesday, November 06, 2007
An inconvenient precedent.
I haven't heard much talk about a column I found quite damning. "Waterboarding Used to Be a Crime" was written by a current judge and law professor who was a JAG in the Nevada National Guard.
The United States knows quite a bit about waterboarding. The U.S. government -- whether acting alone before domestic courts, commissions and courts-martial or as part of the world community -- has not only condemned the use of water torture but has severely punished those who applied it.

The examples he lists include:
  • Japanese soldiers convicted of torture after WWII
  • American soldiers convicted of torturing Filipino guerrillas during the Spanish-American war
  • A Texas sheriff and three deputies convicted of violating the civil rights of prisoners
  • And a successful civil case against the estate of Ferdinand Marcos

We know that U.S. military tribunals and U.S. judges have examined certain types of water-based interrogation and found that they constituted torture. That's a lesson worth learning. The study of law is, after all, largely the study of history. The law of war is no different. This history should be of value to those who seek to understand what the law is -- as well as what it ought to be.

The law is supposed to be based on precedents. Apparently this administration finds this inconvenient.

Labels: , , ,





Google
 
Web paulmurray.net
..